W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > July 2008

Re: CSS2.1 i18n and bidi tests for review

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:30:04 +0200
Message-ID: <486F3F1C.20600@w3.org>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: Eira Monstad <eiram@opera.com>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org, 'Richard Ishida' <ishida@w3.org>

fantasai wrote:

> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/lang-pseudoclass-001.xht
> http://people.opera.com/eiram/test/css21/review/lang-pseudoclass-002.xht
>   Same comments about background-color etc.. but I think we need
>   a spec clarification here before I can review the content of
>   the test. I would expect :lang to be case-insensitive because
>   the language codes are... But that's not specified in the spec,
>   so.. I guess I'll have to file an issue.

Section 5.11.4 indeed doesn't say that the argument of ':lang()' is 
case-insensitive, but I don't think it should. The selector matches 
whatever the document defines to be its language, and although we hope 
and recommend that every document uses RFC 4646 (and the selector 
clearly works best if it does), we don't require that.

This test case uses HTML and HTTP, which do use that RFC, and thus the 
language codes in this test case are indeed case-insensitive.

I think it is correct to test for that, because CSS says (4.1.3) that it 
defers to the document for the case-sensitivity of text that comes from 
the document. I.e., a CSS UA that fails this test case is indeed 
non-conforming.



Bert
-- 
   Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
   http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
   bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
   +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 09:31:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 September 2010 17:51:56 GMT