Re: CSS2.1 i18n and bidi tests for review

Bert Bos wrote:
> 
> I don't know how well the converter deals with invalid XML, but as far 
> as I know it's not actually validating, so an attribute that is invalid 
> but well-formed probably survives.

Right.

> Or the converter could remove the CDATA section, the same way it already 
> does for HTML. (Or almost the same way: for HTML, it is enough to 
> remove the "<![CDATA[" and "]]>", for XHTML it would also have to 
> escape any <, > and &.)

The converter parses the XHTML source file into a document tree
and prints output based on that. Whether the source file used
CDATA or escapes is inconsequential.

~fantasai