- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:36:34 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-css-testsuite@w3.org
On Monday 21 November 2005 11:55, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I would like to see that clarified that in the draft then. (I made > the test.) The syntax seems ambigious at best: > <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax> > > It seems to define 'max-width' as a media feature quite clearly. Section 6 says that 1) media-features can be used without a value, 2) the media features are 'width', 'height'... 'grid', 3) 'width' accepts min-/max- prefixes. From that I conclude that 'max-width' is a media feature with a prefix and not a media feature, and thus must be used *with* a value. That makes sense, because it is unclear what an expression such as screen and (max-width)' would mean. Assuming that the non-terminal "media_feature" in section 5 is meant to list the same media features as section 6, it seems the spec indeed needs some improvement. I'll raise it as an issue in the CSS WG. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Monday, 21 November 2005 12:38:43 UTC