W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > April 2011

csswg/css2-src issues-lc-2011.html,1.4,1.5

From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:08:08 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Q5nRo-0007SW-6l@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css2-src
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv28656

Modified Files:
	issues-lc-2011.html 
Log Message:
More colors to distinguish between deferred and rejected

Index: issues-lc-2011.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css2-src/issues-lc-2011.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -d -r1.4 -r1.5
--- issues-lc-2011.html	1 Apr 2011 21:46:59 -0000	1.4
+++ issues-lc-2011.html	1 Apr 2011 23:08:06 -0000	1.5
@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@
         <style type="text/css">
             body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 1em }
 
-            .a { background: #90ee90; }
-            .d { background: #dedede; }
-            .o { background: #ee9090; }
+            .a { background: lightgreen; }
+            .d { background: lightgray; }
+            .r { background: #ffff66; }
+            .o { background: tomato; }
         </style>
     </head>
     <body>
@@ -16,13 +17,17 @@
         <p>Last call document: <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-CSS2-20101207/</a></p>
         <p>Editor's draft: <a href="http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/">http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/</a></p>
 
-        <p>The following color coding convention is used for comments after the 7 December 2010 publication:</p>
+        <p>The following color coding convention is used for comments:</p>
+
         <ul>
-            <li class="a">The CSS WG agreed with the reviewer and/or resolution accepted by reviewer.</li>
-            <li class="d">The CSS WG disagreed with the reviewer and reviewer has not responded.</li>
-            <li class="o">The CSS WG disagreed with the reviewer and there is an objection.</li>
+         <li class="a">Accepted or Rejected + verified
+         <li class="r">Rejected and not verified
+         <li class="d">Deferred to errata
+         <li class="o">Objection (There were no formal objections.)
         </ul>
-        <p>(There are currently no objections)</p>
+
+<code>Verified</code> indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.</p>
+
 
 <pre class="a" id="issue-142">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-142">CSS2.1 Issue 142</a>.
@@ -134,7 +139,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0256.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0256.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal Accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-206">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-206">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-206">CSS2.1 Issue 206</a>.
 Summary:    Comments on HASH grammar
 From:       Mark
@@ -178,7 +183,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0301.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0301.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-211">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-211">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-211">CSS2.1 Issue 211</a>.
 Summary:    Transitivity error in margin collapsing
 From:       L. David Baron
@@ -196,7 +201,7 @@
 Note:       additional edits to 9.2.1 clarified this issue
 Resolution: No change
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-213">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-213">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-213">CSS2.1 Issue 213</a>.
 Summary:    clarify that forced page breaks on the root element change whether :first is :left or :right
 From:       √ėyvind Stenhaug
@@ -274,7 +279,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0325.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0325.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-225">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-225">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-225">CSS2.1 Issue 225</a>.
 Summary:    Auto height calculation rules confused about margin collapsing
 From:       Anton Prowse
@@ -351,7 +356,7 @@
 Resolution: No change
 Status:     Accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-234">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-234">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-234">CSS2.1 Issue 234</a>.
 Summary:    Margin-collapsing and min-height inconsistent implementations.
 From:       Alan Gresley
@@ -394,7 +399,7 @@
 Resolution: Defer to later CSS version
 Status:     No response
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-239">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-239">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-239">CSS2.1 Issue 239</a>.
 Summary:    Propagate "direction" from BODY to ICB
 From:       David Hyatt
@@ -435,7 +440,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0252.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0252.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-244">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-244">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-244">CSS2.1 Issue 244</a>.
 Summary:    Rendering tree vs. element tree in z-order algo
 From:       Peter Moulder
@@ -444,13 +449,14 @@
 Resolution: No change
 Status:     No response
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-245">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-245">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-245">CSS2.1 Issue 245</a>.
 Summary:    Clarifications to z-index chapter
 From:       Peter Moulder
 Comment:    <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0083.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0083.html</a>
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0362.html</a>
 Resolution: No change
+Note:       Rendering tree not defined in CSS2.1, deferred to future version.
 Status:     No response
 </pre>
 <pre class="a" id="issue-246">
@@ -528,6 +534,7 @@
 From:       Peter Moulder
 Comment:    <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0071.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0071.html</a>
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0289.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0289.html</a>
+Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0042.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0042.html</a>
 Resolution: Defer to errata
 Status:     No response
 </pre>
@@ -539,7 +546,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0290.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0290.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-256">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-256">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-256">CSS2.1 Issue 256</a>.
 Summary:    Clarify form controls and frames
 From:       Anton Prowse
@@ -572,7 +579,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0382.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0382.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-260">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-260">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-260">CSS2.1 Issue 260</a>.
 Summary:    Note about anonymous box inheritance redundant
 From:       Anton Prowse
@@ -581,7 +588,7 @@
 Resolution: No change
 Status:     No response
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-261">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-261">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-261">CSS2.1 Issue 261</a>.
 Summary:    Clarify "other attributes" in specificity calculations
 From:       Anton Prowse
@@ -616,7 +623,7 @@
 Response:   <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0386.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0386.html</a>
 Resolution: Proposal accepted
 </pre>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-265">
+<pre class="r" id="issue-265">
 <a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-265">CSS2.1 Issue 265</a>.
 Summary:    Clarify which table box is affected by float overlap restriction
 From:       Anton Prowse
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 23:08:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 April 2011 23:08:11 GMT