W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 17778] New: Undefined term "block equivalent" used in painting order rules in Appendix E

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:16:11 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-17778-5148@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17778

           Summary: Undefined term "block equivalent" used in painting
                    order rules in Appendix E
           Product: CSS
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: CSS Level 2
        AssignedTo: bert@w3.org
        ReportedBy: antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk
         QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org


Reported by Simon Sapin

Steps 2 and 4 in the painting order rules in Appendix E use the following
condition:

  # If the element is a block, list-item, or other block equivalent:

The term "block equivalent" is undefined in CSS21.  We deduce that it must
include inline-level block container boxes such as inline-blocks and
inline-table wrapper boxes, else such boxes do not have their background and
borders painted in the algorithm.

This term should be clarified.


Conversation begins:
Bug description:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0443.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 11:16:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 14 July 2012 11:16:13 GMT