W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 17778] Undefined term "block equivalent" used in painting order rules in Appendix E

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:55:24 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Sq1sa-0001zy-0O@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17778

--- Comment #1 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-07-14 12:55:23 UTC ---
The term must also include block-level replaced elements, for the same reason.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jul/0336.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 12:55:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 14 July 2012 12:55:25 GMT