W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 17778] Undefined term "block equivalent" used in painting order rules in Appendix E

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:34:55 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Sq2Up-0008QZ-7i@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17778

--- Comment #2 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-07-14 13:34:55 UTC ---
Proposal A:

Replace:
  # Step 2: If the element is a block, list-item, or other block
  #         equivalent:
with
  | Step 2: If the element is a block container or block-level replaced
  |         element:

Similarly, replace:
  # Step 4: For all its in-flow, non-positioned, block-level
  #         descendants in tree order: If the element is a block,
  #         list-item, or other block equivalent:
with:
  | Step 4: For all its in-flow, non-positioned, block-level
  |         descendants in tree order:
  |         If the element is a block container or replaced element:

(Note the line break, which I think adds needed clarity).

The suggested replacement in the former case has a dependency on Bug 17780
since it needs to exclude table cells.

The suggested replacement in the latter case has a dependency on Bug 17779
since since it needs to exclude replaced table boxes.

Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0498.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 13:34:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 14 July 2012 13:34:56 GMT