- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:29:08 -0400
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 06/22/2017 01:28 PM, Steven Rowat wrote: >> this set is limited and does not contain sufficient alternatives >> e.g. Subject is missing > > I was wondering about this also. Will all the alternatives from the > playground be added to this list eventually? The alternatives from this document will be added to the playground before the poll opens: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NWdpFxbERXZodvbJP_GgGZhkGI54zWmqTuFz-CR2hps/edit REPEAT: If you do not get your alternatives into the document above by next Monday, they will not be included in the poll. When you suggest new terminology, you MUST make sure that at least someone else supports your proposed term AND there are no more than two people that object to your proposed terminology. This hopefully prevents there being a sea of choices that further complicates the vote while not raising the bar to getting a new term into the poll that high. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 13:29:37 UTC