W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2017

Re: RFCs in RDF

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:56:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok1VD1Rad1NC5Zii05+h0D7-4zANu7Q8RXzPGppVAX5z2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, public-credentials@w3.org
Did the logic make any sense?

I also saw: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3870.txt. Whilst exploring the

Underlying theory is,

I've been contemplating the potential role of what's been recommended to be
a SIG to deal with some of the more ISOC related subjects; some of which
I'd expect to be ontology.

Exploring ideas about how W3C, IEEE, ISOC might all start to bring together
an effective Cooperative towards this and other

related stuff.

My quite old note is:

Therein some examples of how ISOC work might bring value to a broader
project that requires works done in an array of areas cooperatively.


On Wed., 14 Jun. 2017, 5:44 am Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor), <
rse@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> On 6/13/17 12:34 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote:
> >
> > (Off topic) question: has anyone ever considered publishing RFC's in
> > RDF?  (I.e. both txt & RDF)
> >
> *coming out of lurking mode*
> Hi Tim,
> The RFC Editor has no plans for publishing RFCs in RDF. We do have
> extensive plans, however, to start publishing TXT, HTML, and PDF/A-3
> (each transformed from a base XML). I would have liked to have added
> EPUB to the list, but couldn't get anyone to write the necessary
> detailed requirements doc for it. The new RFC format will allow
> non-ASCII characters and black-and-white SVG art. Crazy times. :-)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rse/format-faq/
> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/FormatToolsPlan
> -Heather Flanagan
> RFC Series Editor
Received on Tuesday, 13 June 2017 19:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:38 UTC