W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > March 2016

Feedback overlooked, or deferred? -- Re: Verifiable Claims Telecon Minutes for 2016-03-15

From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:11:10 -0700
To: msporny@digitalbazaar.com, Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>, shane@spec-ops.io
Message-ID: <56E8503E.60508@sunshine.net>
On 3/15/16 9:46 AM, msporny@digitalbazaar.com wrote:
> Thanks to Brian Sletten for scribing this week! The minutes
> for this week's Verifiable Claims telecon are now available:
> http://w3c.github.io/vctf/meetings/2016-03-15/
> Resolutions:
>    1. Integrate as much feedback as possible before 3pm today

Interesting lesson in online democracy in the transcript of the call 
today!  :-)

+1 to credential repository. May not be the pleasantest word but seems 
to be the one with the least major downsides.

But I note that the suggestion of "identity fragility" expansion, 
discussed recently, is still unchanged in the Editor's Draft and was 
not mentioned. Also Tim's suggestion that ODRL be mentioned in 
Liaisons. And two or three other things that have cropped up in the 
last two or three days in others' posts.

Are these lost forever to history? :-0

Or, will they be considered, and potentially included, after the 
circulation post-3pm today, if all goes well?  :-)

I understand that the 'identity fragility' and ODRL points may have 
been judged by the current Editors as too minor to make the cut-off 
for today, but I'd like to know if the process is preserving them, 
because I don't feel they're too minor to be overlooked in the long 
run if Verifiable Claims has eventual wide usage.

Steven Rowat
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:11:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:11:41 UTC