W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > January 2016

Re: Working on the VCTF Use Cases

From: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 06:41:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+EnjbKJBa-JpAMgCy4sSG4pTr+GU+uCGoAgRDMfLQHGRsvhEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Guys, I'm checking into the possibility of duplicating the WebRTC github
setup for our work.  Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux, developer of many of the
tools editors have been using, including the PubRules checker, has been
building up tooling for us in WebRTC, including Travis scripts.  I think we
could benefit from borrowing what he's set up.

I will ask the WebRTC Chairs in today's WebRTC editors' call if they have
any problems with it, and if not I'll talk with Dom to see what would be
needed.  We have a few publication oddities that would need to be adjusted.

Regarding repositories, many groups differ in opinion on how separated the
different specs in their groupls should be.  Having started with the two
primary WebRTC specs being together but eventually separating them because
they progressed independently, I would highly recommend a separate
repository for each but with a common initial name, e.g., vctf-use-cases
for this document.

-- dan

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
wrote:

> No - I don't think they have been published yet.
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Today in the VCTF call I and a few others offered to get the use cases
>> into W3C form and cleaned up.  I would like to get started on this straight
>> away.
>>
>> Hi Shane,
>>
>> Do you have a link to the minutes of the meeting? Thanks,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> >
>> > I know that we are working on github [1].  Is there any reason not to
>> put the documents in that tree?  And if they are in that tree, does it make
>> sense to put then under some top level folder (documents?) or should each
>> document be in its own top level folder (usecases)?
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/w3c/vctf
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Shane
>>
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Shane
>
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 11:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:26 UTC