W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > January 2016

Re: Working on the VCTF Use Cases

From: Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:12:16 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOAKLM+XtuDHLuoisDzLgkqCGMcr1YVzuBXzSOdkE+_4dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Thanks for looking into using the WebRTC structures.  As to separate repos
- I understand your rationale.  How did you deal with common terminology /
glossary stuff?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Guys, I'm checking into the possibility of duplicating the WebRTC github
> setup for our work.  Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux, developer of many of the
> tools editors have been using, including the PubRules checker, has been
> building up tooling for us in WebRTC, including Travis scripts.  I think we
> could benefit from borrowing what he's set up.
>
> I will ask the WebRTC Chairs in today's WebRTC editors' call if they have
> any problems with it, and if not I'll talk with Dom to see what would be
> needed.  We have a few publication oddities that would need to be adjusted.
>
> Regarding repositories, many groups differ in opinion on how separated the
> different specs in their groupls should be.  Having started with the two
> primary WebRTC specs being together but eventually separating them because
> they progressed independently, I would highly recommend a separate
> repository for each but with a common initial name, e.g., vctf-use-cases
> for this document.
>
> -- dan
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
> wrote:
>
>> No - I don't think they have been published yet.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > On Jan 19, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Today in the VCTF call I and a few others offered to get the use cases
>>> into W3C form and cleaned up.  I would like to get started on this straight
>>> away.
>>>
>>> Hi Shane,
>>>
>>> Do you have a link to the minutes of the meeting? Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I know that we are working on github [1].  Is there any reason not to
>>> put the documents in that tree?  And if they are in that tree, does it make
>>> sense to put then under some top level folder (documents?) or should each
>>> document be in its own top level folder (usecases)?
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://github.com/w3c/vctf
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -Shane
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Shane
>>
>
>


-- 
-Shane
Received on Thursday, 21 January 2016 15:12:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:26 UTC