- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:17:23 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>, public-coremob@w3.org
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 10:52, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Mar 30, 2012, at 00:01 , Scott Wilson wrote: > > Or just publish Rich's thing as a Note and have done. Its not exactly rocket science. > > > > Standards aren't about rocket science, they're about agreement, deployment, interoperability. It doesn't matter how simple it is, we need to agree on what it looks like :) Agreed. Without some new interested parties, this will have limited impact. It's the reason we haven't bothered to create the JSON serialisation. Note that I did put all the bits in place… I even renamed the P&C document to "...and *XML* configuration" in anticipation a follow up "and JSON configuration" document. > > > I doubt anyone in practice would want to write a config.json file for their app, but I don't think we're dealing with practical concerns here. > Well, we're dealing with the practical concern that we need something supported in this space and it doesn't look like config.xml is going to be massively supported any time soon. I like bike-sheds - lets paint this one JSON :) -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 10:17:59 UTC