W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: ACTION-928: progress registration of the X-Device-*

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4A57622A.8030205@w3.org>
To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
One reply - which doesn't appear in the archives of the IETF 
mailing-list as of now but should appear in a short amount of time as a 
reply to my original email I suppose - suggests that we provisionally 
register both the X-Device-foo *and* the Device-foo header fields.

The reply goes on to suggest that we then transition away from the 
X-Device-foo on our way to REC which is not what the working group wants 
from previous discussions on the topic. That said, if the X-Device-foo 
header field is provisionally registered, I doubt the Device-foo header 
field would be available for registration by anyone else anyway.

How about we provisionally register both the header fields with and 
without the "X-" prefix?

I support the idea (as much as I support the registration of the 
X-Device-foo header fields in general, that is), and do not object 
sticking to the X-Device- format only.

Dan, Jo, could you add the question to next Tuesday's agenda for resolution?

Francois.


Francois Daoust wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> FYI, I officially requested the provisional registration of the 
> X-Device-* HTTP header. See email on the dedicated IETF mailing-list:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00098.html 
> 
> 
> This is the first step of a two-step process. Depending on the comments 
> received in the next few weeks, I may then be able to have them included 
> in the IANA provisional message header field registry at:
>  http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/prov-headers.html
> 
> Francois.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 15:47:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:01 UTC