- From: Manrique Lopez <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:03:32 +0100
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
El jue, 13-11-2008 a las 11:53 +0000, Jo Rabin escribió: > > Why not keeping the previous value (http://validator.w3.org/mobile/), > and explain that supportedBy value could be any checker interface > available, like the ones mentioned before (CTIC and .mobi ones) > > > > Because having specifically called out the W3C interface in the earlier > section it seems fair to mention another checker elsewhere, especially > since I'm an editor of the document and would like my company's products > recognised too. Recall that the W3C Web interface is not endorsed by the > BPWG (it's just the checker library that is). > > It would be reasonable to add the note you mention for clarification, > anyhow. > So, keeping in mind that the document should be as much neutral as we can, I think we should use an "example" value, like: <supportedby src="http://example.net/validator" /> And add the note for clarification -- José Manrique López de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org> Área de Tecnología Fundación CTIC Web: http://www.fundacionctic.org Tel: (+34) 984 29 12 12 Parque Científico Tecnológico de Gijón Edificio Centros Tecnológicos Cabueñes s/n 33203 GIJÓN - ASTURIAS - ESPAÑA #Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 12:18:31 UTC