W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: New Draft MobileOK Scheme 1.0 2008-11-13

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:06:01 +0000
Message-ID: <491C1829.5@mtld.mobi>
To: manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org
CC: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>

That seems fair to me.

Jo

On 13/11/2008 12:03, Manrique Lopez wrote:
> El jue, 13-11-2008 a las 11:53 +0000, Jo Rabin escribió:
>>> Why not keeping the previous value (http://validator.w3.org/mobile/), 
>> and explain that supportedBy value could be any checker interface 
>> available, like the ones mentioned before (CTIC and .mobi ones)
>>  >
>>
>> Because having specifically called out the W3C interface in the earlier 
>> section it seems fair to mention another checker elsewhere, especially 
>> since I'm an editor of the document and would like my company's products 
>> recognised too. Recall that the W3C Web interface is not endorsed by the 
>> BPWG (it's just the checker library that is).
>>
>> It would be reasonable to add the note you mention for clarification, 
>> anyhow.
>>
> 
> So, keeping in mind that the document should be as much neutral as we
> can, I think we should use an "example" value, like:
> <supportedby src="http://example.net/validator" />
> 
> And add the note for clarification
> 
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 12:18:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:59 UTC