W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: New draft of mobileOK Scheme 2008-11-06

From: Phil Archer <parcher@fosi.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:18:14 +0000
Message-ID: <49136D26.30905@fosi.org>
To: MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Whilst I understand that this draft reflects the resolutions taken at 
TPAC, I would like to propose an addition to the document that at least 
points to the option to make the mobileOK claim machine-readable as follows.

2. Further Steps
As the previous section makes clear, the mobileOK trustmark is an icon 
that may be included on any Web page that conforms to mobileOK Basic 
Tests. However, it is possible to go further and make the claim 
machine-readable using any of a number of different methods, thus making 
mobileOK content more readily discoverable. The Protocol for Web 
Description Resources [@@POWDER] includes an example of how to do this 
in its documentation and alternatives include RDFa and microformats (@@ 
link to Jonathanís work on this)

Link to http://www.w3.org/TR/powder-dr/#evidence (this is due to be 
updated w/c 10 November, see it now at 
http://philarcher.org/powder/20081104.html#evidence

WDYT?

Phil.




Jo Rabin wrote:
> 
> Hi folks, I have updated the Editor's draft of mobileOK scheme [1] in 
> line with the resolutions taken at the F2F. I did not put anything in 
> the document about sticking a date in the ALT test for the trustmark as 
> I don't recall that actually being a resolution. And anyway, I don't 
> understand what that is supposed to represent, how you'd encode it and 
> why it would be useful, what effect it would have on the correct use of 
> ALT and so on.
> 
> I'd like to close out on this by the time mobileOK Basic Tests goes to 
> Rec (early Dec). A couple of  further things need sorting out on this:
> 
> a) ACTION-869 - Review the mobileOK license in more details and send 
> further questions to rigo [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-10-27]
> 
> b) RESOLUTION: Dom, Jo and Rigo to form a subcommittee to come back with 
> a final proposal to the group within 4 weeks following on from Rigo's 
> current proposal.
> 
> I'm attending to these now. Meanwhile would appreciate comments on the 
> latest draft.
> 
> thanks
> Jo
> 
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Trustmark/20081106
> 
> 

-- 
Phil Archer
w. http://philarcher.org/
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 22:25:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:59 UTC