W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Mobile Markup Test

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:00:16 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0706081000j4f230fddjd10f30c51fb2ade3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Herwig Feichtinger" <hf@isdn-capi.de>
Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org

Keep in mind this was an early implementation from Dom and is not
necessarily up-to-date with respect to the test spec, or may have some
bugs. For example the test spec allows for XHTML MP now. I'm not sure
about the text/plain issue.

You might also look at http://ready.mobi and
http://validadores.tawdis.net/mobileok for other mostly-up-to-date
implementations mobileOK Basic. A reference implementation is


On 6/8/07, Herwig Feichtinger <hf@isdn-capi.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have just changed the <h2> to <h1>. The corresponding
> heading error is gone, but a new one came up:
> "The page has text/plain as a media type; that media type is not
> supported by Default Delivery Context."
> That's funny since the content-type header line delivered by
> the HTTP server for www.shamrock.de/pda is:
> Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=iso-8859-1
> So what's wrong with this one? Or is it a temporary glitch
> in the validator?
> The other "problem" (DOCTYPE = XHTML MP instead of XHTML Basic 1.0)
> is by intention. Look at www.google.com/pda or other sites
> for a mobile audience, they also result in this validation error.
> Herwig
> "Sergiu Dumitriu" <sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >The page isn't valid with respect to the XHTML Basic profile. [...]
> >The second error is not about the img tag, but about the fact that
> >there is no <h1> element. [...]
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 17:00:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:56 UTC