W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-pro@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Status mobileOK Pro

From: Manrique Lopez <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 13:43:33 +0200
To: public-bpwg-pro@w3.org
Message-Id: <1210851813.7934.4.camel@bespin>

Hi!

I've have done tests 4.27 to 4.31, so my draft/part is ready. Should I
send the doc to the list or to Kai?

Thanks,

El mar, 06-05-2008 a las 17:17 +0200, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich escribió:
> Go ahead Manrique, run with it :-)
> Please reformulate the tests that we had assigned to Dan.
> 
> 
> As for Testing...
> 
> > I am not sure about this, but maybe TESTING is something 
> > related with other tests, and providing a group of device 
> > capabilities could help making other tests more repeatable. 
> > Consider something like:
> > TESTING
> > "Inform about the next device capabilities used in tests:
> > - Screen size (or resolution)
> > - Color depth"
> > If capabilities listed in each category are less than 2 
> > [FAIL] (to make the 'tester' use more than 3 different sizes 
> > or color depths, i.e.) If capabilitites listed are more than 
> > 2 and less than 4 [WARN] If capabilitites listed are 5 or more [PASS]
> > 
> > This way, some tests could be releated with this:
> > - PAGE SIZE USABLE: For each "screen size" value in TESTING, 
> > if page exceeds 3 screen sizes in length [FAIL]
> 
> 
> The core of the TESTING Best Practice is that testing should be performed.
> The problem is, how to do you check it both quantitatively and qualitatively?
> While providing a suite a capabilities that should be tested surely is a good thing (and not a bad idea at that), it will always be short of what we need.
> Also, there is more to it.  For example testing with different and real devices, not emulators or the DDC...for example.
> 
> We have not found an answer to this, but if you can work out a clear test for testing I'd be curious to see it.
> 
> 
> -- Kai
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Just an idea...
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > El lun, 05-05-2008 a las 09:41 +0200, Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich escribió:
> > > Hi,
> > >  
> > > It's been very quiet on this front.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > @Dan
> > > Have you been able to rework the tests assigned to you?
> > > I believe they were 4.27 - 4.31
> > >  
> > > I believe they are the only ones missing.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > If Dan is unable to do this, would somebody be willing to redo the 
> > > tests assigned to him
> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > @Manrique
> > > you had asked questions
> > >  
> > > > Are there any updates to discussed questions from last week?
> > > > 
> > > > TESTING
> > > > PAGE SIZE USABLE
> > > > USE OF COLOR
> > >  
> > > No, I am not aware of any updates.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Other questions about tests:
> > > > PAGE TITLE
> > > > "Is the title too long to display on a screen matching 
> > the Default 
> > > > Delivery Context? [WARN]"
> > > > 
> > > > Considering that DDC is 120px wide, is this test considering the 
> > > > font size used by the device to show texts? I mean, a 
> > 20px wide font 
> > > > takes more space than a 8px one.
> > >  
> > > From what I remember, that is the reason this test is a WARN only.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > -- Kai
> > --
> > José Manrique López de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
> > Área de Tecnología Fundación CTIC
> > Web: http://www.fundacionctic.org
> > Tel: (+34) 984 29 12 12
> > Parque Científico Tecnológico de Gijón
> > Edificio Centros Tecnológicos
> > Cabueñes s/n
> > 33203 GIJÓN - ASTURIAS - ESPAÑA
> > #Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario 
> > hacerlo: El medioambiente es cosa de todos.
> > 
> > 
> > 
-- 
José Manrique López de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
Área de Tecnología Fundación CTIC
Web: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Tel: (+34) 984 29 12 12
Parque Científico Tecnológico de Gijón
Edificio Centros Tecnológicos
Cabueñes s/n
33203 GIJÓN - ASTURIAS - ESPAÑA
#Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El
medioambiente es cosa de todos.
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 11:44:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 May 2008 11:44:15 GMT