W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-pro@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Status mobileOK Pro

From: Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 22:31:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4C7C3551020AE442A8994B13EAF69DDC22C88D@VF-MBX11.internal.vodafone.com>
To: <public-bpwg-pro@w3.org>
Cc: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>
Sorry all – I haven’t been able to complete my action here and it doesn’t look good for the next couple of days. I suggest someone else take this action if possible.





From: Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich [mailto:k.scheppe@telekom.de] 
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 8:41 AM
To: public-bpwg-pro@w3.org
Cc: Appelquist, Daniel, VF-Group
Subject: Status mobileOK Pro




It's been very quiet on this front.




Have you been able to rework the tests assigned to you?

I believe they were 4.27 - 4.31 


I believe they are the only ones missing.



If Dan is unable to do this, would somebody be willing to redo the tests assigned to him





you had asked questions 


> Are there any updates to discussed questions from last week?


No, I am not aware of any updates.

> Other questions about tests:
> "Is the title too long to display on a screen matching the 
> Default Delivery Context? [WARN]"
> Considering that DDC is 120px wide, is this test considering 
> the font size used by the device to show texts? I mean, a 
> 20px wide font takes more space than a 8px one.


From what I remember, that is the reason this test is a WARN only.



-- Kai

Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 20:32:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:40:30 UTC