W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > September 2008

[agenda] CT Call Tuesday 16 September 2008

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:52:49 +0200
Message-ID: <48CE3071.2090302@w3.org>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

Hi CT fans,

Here comes tomorrow's agenda.
One topic: resolution of Last Call comments.
Let me know if you want to add/remove anything.

Francois.


-----
Chair: Fran├žois
Staff Contact: Fran├žois
Known regrets: Tom

Date: 2008-09-16T1400Z for 60mn
Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152
Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key
IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665.


1. Short point on the process
-----
- simply to mention that decisions we take within the TF will have to be 
validated by the main body of the working group before we may consider 
them as official positions and get back to people officially.
- blah blah efficiency blah blah discussion blah blah mailing-list. Time 
flies fast.


2. Guidelines vs. Protocol
-----
was ACTION-828 on Jo

See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2008JulSep/0139.html 
and replies
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2008JulSep/0141.html 
and replies

Remove normative statements that profile or extend HTTP?
Switch normative statements that apply to servers to non-normative 
statements?

Last Call comments:
LC-2043
LC-2074
LC-2079
LC-2040
and possibly:
LC-2007


3. LC-2018: on the title
-----
ACTION-831 on SeanP
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0009.html and 
replies

And the winning title is ???


4. LC-2067: conformance to SHOULD
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0021.html and 
replies

Implementation Conformance Statement?


5. LC-2050: restructuring, recoding and optimizing
-----
ACTION-832 on SeanP
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0010.html

Remove definitions altogether?
Merge recoding and optimizing?


6. LC-2025: On the quality and purpose of the doc
-----
ACTION-829 on Heiko
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0004.html and 
reply

Stick to clear concise normative wording but complete with use cases and 
examples?


7. LC-2012: clarification of the introduction
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0015.html


8. LC-2023: transformation across character sets
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0014.html and 
replies

Remain silent on this, as before?
Write down a few generic normative statements for conformance reasons?


9. AOB
------
Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 09:53:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 15 September 2008 09:53:24 GMT