W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [CTG] Draft 2008-11-07 / Testing

From: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:39:40 -0800 (PST)
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Cc: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
Message-ID: <894632.35726.qm@web45002.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

> The conformance statement would be a place to detail the
> first and the second is what is intended in this section.

All right.

> Conventional might be a better word.

All right.

> I take path to mean physical arrangements not protocols but
> if that's not clear we should discuss it.

Since access in the Internet is mediated through protocols, which is the level of abstraction that most developers rely upon (not on the details of the physical network configuration), I believe a clarification is in order.

E.Casais


      
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:48:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:48:13 GMT