W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > November 2008

Re: [CTG] Draft 2008-11-07 / Testing

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:08:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4919679E.4090402@mtld.mobi>
To: casays@yahoo.com
CC: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org

I think that what we are trying to get at is that access is provided 
from the developer's computer where that is placed in a conventional 
access arrangement in respect of the Web in general. Seems a bit wordy 
but if not clear then we should change current wording.

Jo

On 11/11/2008 10:39, Eduardo Casais wrote:
>> The conformance statement would be a place to detail the
>> first and the second is what is intended in this section.
> 
> All right.
> 
>> Conventional might be a better word.
> 
> All right.
> 
>> I take path to mean physical arrangements not protocols but
>> if that's not clear we should discuss it.
> 
> Since access in the Internet is mediated through protocols, which is the level of abstraction that most developers rely upon (not on the details of the physical network configuration), I believe a clarification is in order.
> 
> E.Casais
> 
> 
>       
> 
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:09:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 11:09:37 GMT