> I don't think I agree. If a server doesn't want > HTTPS links rewritten then it can prevent this happening by > adding no-transform. Once a secure link is established > it's moot as the proxy has no sight of that traffic. > See above. The no-transform applies to the page with the > original HTTPS link in -i.e. 1 - so 2 can't happen. This is valid under the assumption that the first request -- the one to the page containing the original https URI -- is made to the same server, under the same transformation conditions. There is no way to ensure this is true. If the https URI is contained in a page returned from another server (e.g. a page of results from a search engine), which does not apply no-transform, then the situation I described may well occur: the URI is rewritten (search results page), the modified request is made to the server, and so on. > And that is the Via header. It's not possible to find a > Via header in an HTTPS connection that hasn't been > intercepted. Francois has an action to discuss your earlier > point with relevant folks. All right, the case is still open. E.CasaisReceived on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:47:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 10:47:48 GMT