W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Feb 2011 AWWSW status report - F2F prep reading

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:18:09 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4u+3hxH49ZtvMg0AM4VJzDhX1T+RXT7eKTi-K@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> You need to introduce "S" earlier, where you introduce "R".  Something
> like: "R contains a description of literary work, S".  At present, the
> first mention of S is when Bob says "No he didn't, he said it applied to
> S".

I did that intentionally, to encourage readers to sympathizing with
Alice. Since S is described where it's introduced, I don't think this
is confusing. Good suggestion but I think I won't take it... maybe I
can bring out the surprise element somehow though.

> Also, "u:u" is using a the Turtle shorthand to refer to the URI.  For
> non-RDF folks I think it may be clearer to just spell out an example
> URI, such as http://example/u , and use that in the example Turtle also:
>
>  <http://example/u> xhtml:license
>    <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/>

I considered this. Actually u:u is meant to be a dereferenceable URI,
with scheme u, not a qname. In an earlier version I explained this but
took the explanation out for brevity, probably a mistake. (In an even
earlier version I used a metavariable U, which is better in some ways
and worse in others.) Using example.com just seemed too long - there
are 14 occurrences. Using a TLD does make it a bit shorter, so that's
good. (Then you don't even need the 'u'.) I'll give it a try and look
it over to see how it reads.

Thanks for the close read.
Jonathan

> thanks,
> David
>
> On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 05:14 +0000, Jonathan Rees wrote:
>> Please read
>>
>>    <http://w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/2011/status-2011-02.html>
>>
>> before the corresponding F2F session. If you're short on time, read
>> only the use case.
>>
>> (Is it clear what this URI refers to?)
>>
>> I may need to fix bugs, in which case I will mark any changed spots clearly.
>>
>> ACTION-201
>>
>> Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 16:18:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 February 2011 16:18:47 GMT