W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > February 2014

RE: Running status and Climate type merge

From: Justin Park <jongseon.park@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:32:05 +0900
To: "'Rees, Kevron'" <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
Cc: <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007001cf33a7$290174b0$7b045e10$@lge.com>
Hi Kevron,

I considered something like below.
https://rawgithub.com/jsbach86/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html

It looks quite long even though we didn't merge all yet.
However, do we need to make it on the same document since all interfaces should share 'basic interfaces'?

Regards,
Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:59 AM
To: 박종선(Justin Park)
Cc: public-autowebplatform@w3.org
Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, 박종선(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevron,
>
> Two links below have some differences.
> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
> It seems to applied my patch.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8
> But, it's the previous one you suggested before.
>
> I updated the original one to apply Paul's and your opinions, but 
> didn't reflect changing SideWindow to Window by including defrost.
> It's hard to say which one is correct or wrong, but it looks natural 
> to bind defrost equipment together including side mirrors, and to bind 
> side windows for openness.
> It's close to group interfaces based on functions rather than objects.
> My automotive experience may make me biased toward this.
>

I'm okay with different functional interfaces if the group is.  My new merge request has your more pristine version.  Although, I may have messed up ClimateControl.  Please look to make sure it is correct.

> In addition, how about grouping the interfaces into several groups as 
> we divided the works.

Do you mean keep them as separate documents?  Or just sections within the main spec itself?

> If we merged all the interfaces, the document will be quite long and 
> many interfaces will be located on the same level.
> Although the grouping itself don't have any meaning, it could make it 
> easy to see the document and look more organized.
>

Do you mean something like this:

https://github.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/blob/master/vehicle_spec.html#L190

BR,
Kevron

> Regards,
> Justin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:05 AM
>> To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge
>>
>> This is what the draft will look like after the merge:
>> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rees, Kevron 
>> <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8
>> >
>> > I'll leave it open for comments for a few days and then merge it in.
>> >
>> > -Kevron
>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 10:32:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:52 UTC