W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Running status and Climate type merge

From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 08:23:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFW5wYap5GhaEzYtRdMwAc7NAMUxrZqN_jxjZf0p84TbO_XtAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 박종선(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com>
Cc: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Excellent.  I like it.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:32 AM, 박종선(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevron,
>
> I considered something like below.
> https://rawgithub.com/jsbach86/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>
> It looks quite long even though we didn't merge all yet.
> However, do we need to make it on the same document since all interfaces should share 'basic interfaces'?
>
> Regards,
> Justin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:59 AM
> To: 박종선(Justin Park)
> Cc: public-autowebplatform@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, 박종선(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote:
>> Hi Kevron,
>>
>> Two links below have some differences.
>> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>> It seems to applied my patch.
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8
>> But, it's the previous one you suggested before.
>>
>> I updated the original one to apply Paul's and your opinions, but
>> didn't reflect changing SideWindow to Window by including defrost.
>> It's hard to say which one is correct or wrong, but it looks natural
>> to bind defrost equipment together including side mirrors, and to bind
>> side windows for openness.
>> It's close to group interfaces based on functions rather than objects.
>> My automotive experience may make me biased toward this.
>>
>
> I'm okay with different functional interfaces if the group is.  My new merge request has your more pristine version.  Although, I may have messed up ClimateControl.  Please look to make sure it is correct.
>
>> In addition, how about grouping the interfaces into several groups as
>> we divided the works.
>
> Do you mean keep them as separate documents?  Or just sections within the main spec itself?
>
>> If we merged all the interfaces, the document will be quite long and
>> many interfaces will be located on the same level.
>> Although the grouping itself don't have any meaning, it could make it
>> easy to see the document and look more organized.
>>
>
> Do you mean something like this:
>
> https://github.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/blob/master/vehicle_spec.html#L190
>
> BR,
> Kevron
>
>> Regards,
>> Justin
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:05 AM
>>> To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge
>>>
>>> This is what the draft will look like after the merge:
>>> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rees, Kevron
>>> <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8
>>> >
>>> > I'll leave it open for comments for a few days and then merge it in.
>>> >
>>> > -Kevron
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 16:23:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:52:52 UTC