W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > March 2007

Re: [AC] alternative name for "except"

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:22:23 -0400
Message-Id: <70179754-95AA-40FC-96D9-8FBC4784A139@nokia.com>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
To: ext Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

Anne,

On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:56 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>  (1) allow / exclude
>  (2) allow / unless
>  (3) allow / deny
>  (4) allow / restrain
>  (5) allow / allow-not
>  (6) allow / refuse
>
> Since the second name of the options above lists exclusions (a  
> match against any of its values doesn't necessarily mean that  
> access is denied) number 3 and 6 are potentially confusing.
>
> I think I'll go for 1 as it seems to be closest to "except" except  
> that it doesn't sound like "accept".

I support using "exclude".

Regards,

Art Barstow
---
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 20:23:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT