- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:54:16 +1000
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "ext Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
FWIW, Exclude works for me too. On 3/29/07, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > > Anne, > > On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:56 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > (1) allow / exclude > > (2) allow / unless > > (3) allow / deny > > (4) allow / restrain > > (5) allow / allow-not > > (6) allow / refuse > > > > Since the second name of the options above lists exclusions (a > > match against any of its values doesn't necessarily mean that > > access is denied) number 3 and 6 are potentially confusing. > > > > I think I'll go for 1 as it seems to be closest to "except" except > > that it doesn't sound like "accept". > > I support using "exclude". > > Regards, > > Art Barstow > --- > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 23:54:22 UTC