W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > March 2007

Re: [AC] alternative name for "except"

From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:54:16 +1000
Message-ID: <b21a10670703281654m3271b4e9lb58b496b17b94b50@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: "ext Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>

FWIW, Exclude works for me too.

On 3/29/07, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Anne,
>
> On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:56 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> >  (1) allow / exclude
> >  (2) allow / unless
> >  (3) allow / deny
> >  (4) allow / restrain
> >  (5) allow / allow-not
> >  (6) allow / refuse
> >
> > Since the second name of the options above lists exclusions (a
> > match against any of its values doesn't necessarily mean that
> > access is denied) number 3 and 6 are potentially confusing.
> >
> > I think I'll go for 1 as it seems to be closest to "except" except
> > that it doesn't sound like "accept".
>
> I support using "exclude".
>
> Regards,
>
> Art Barstow
> ---
>
>
>


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 23:54:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT