On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:36:41 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > This is a last call comment on the XBL 2 Editor’s Draft (dated 27 > October 2006). > > I’d just like to confirm that CSS support is not required for a > conforming XBL implementation. I can imagine for example SVG Tiny 1.2 > implementations that implement XBL 2.0 but not mandating CSS support, > and I wouldn’t want those invalidated. What makes you think it is? (It's not required, nor is ECMAScript. Selectors is.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 21:31:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT