Anne van Kesteren: > What makes you think it is? It doesn’t say anywhere that it isn’t required, and there is a lot of text and examples in the document that uses or describes processing with CSS. The only optional-ish language I could find was in section 2: XBL user agents that support CSS should act as if they had the following rules in their UA style sheet: … XBL user agents that do not support CSS should not render the XBL elements other than the div element, which they should render as a paragraph-like element. In the Conformance section, it states: XBL user agents must behave as described by this specification, even when faced with non-conformant XBL subtrees. but it doesn’t say that the CSS parts are optional. > (It's not required, nor is ECMAScript. Selectors is.) I think it should be made clearer in the Conformance section. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.auReceived on Thursday, 7 December 2006 21:37:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:20 GMT