W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > July 2018

Re: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:10:12 -0400
To: "Siegman, Tzviya" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Cc: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, APA WG <public-apa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20180723131012.GB2191@rednote.net>
Thanks, Tzviya! Your review would be most welcome.

Janina

Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken writes:
> Hi All,
> 
> I haven’t been very active in APA recently, but I have participated in a11y reviews in the past. I am also active in the Verifiable Claims WG, so I’d be happy to help with this review.
> 
> Tzviya
> 
> Tzviya Siegman
> Information Standards Lead
> Wiley
> 201-748-6884
> tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>
> 
> From: Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 8:15 PM
> To: APA WG <public-apa@w3.org>
> Subject: Fwd: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:
> 
> REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0
> 
> Resent-Date:
> 
> Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:20:43 +0000
> 
> Resent-From:
> 
> w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> 
> Date:
> 
> Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:19:38 -0400
> 
> From:
> 
> Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com><mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>
> 
> To:
> 
> w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> 
> CC:
> 
> Matt Stone <mstone@stonecover.com><mailto:mstone@stonecover.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com><mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com><mailto:dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net><mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", is beyond First Public Working Draft but not yet ready for Candidate Recommendation.
> 
> We would like to ask for any early comments you might have on our admittedly incomplete specification, in an attempt to address any major issues earlier rather than later.
> 
> Would your group (or some members of your group) be willing to give the document an informal read-through?  We are looking for comments within approximately a 60-day timeframe if possible.
> 
> The best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [1] as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [2] work as well.  Comments on either the (stable) dated draft [3] or the live Editor's Draft [4] are fine, whichever is easiest for you.
> 
> If you need anything else from us first, please don't hesitate to contact the chairs directly.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group
> 
> CC: Specification editors
> 
> 
> [1] GitHub repo:  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
> [2] Mailing list:  public-vc-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>
> [3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/
> [4] Tip of tree editor's draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/
> 

-- 

Janina Sajka

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 23 July 2018 13:10:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 July 2018 13:10:41 UTC