W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > July 2018

RE: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 12:03:58 +0000
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, APA WG <public-apa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB40920FF5683E9C0062DE4573D5560@DM6PR02MB4092.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Hi All,

I haven’t been very active in APA recently, but I have participated in a11y reviews in the past. I am also active in the Verifiable Claims WG, so I’d be happy to help with this review.

Tzviya

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 8:15 PM
To: APA WG <public-apa@w3.org>
Subject: Fwd: REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:

REQUEST for preliminary review: Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0

Resent-Date:

Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:20:43 +0000

Resent-From:

w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Date:

Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:19:38 -0400

From:

Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com><mailto:danielcburnett@gmail.com>

To:

w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

CC:

Matt Stone <mstone@stonecover.com><mailto:mstone@stonecover.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com><mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com><mailto:dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net><mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>


Hi,

The Verifiable Claims Working Group's one standards-track specification, "Verifiable Credentials Data Model 1.0", is beyond First Public Working Draft but not yet ready for Candidate Recommendation.

We would like to ask for any early comments you might have on our admittedly incomplete specification, in an attempt to address any major issues earlier rather than later.

Would your group (or some members of your group) be willing to give the document an informal read-through?  We are looking for comments within approximately a 60-day timeframe if possible.

The best place for comments is directly in our GitHub repo [1] as new issues, but comments sent to our comments mailing list [2] work as well.  Comments on either the (stable) dated draft [3] or the live Editor's Draft [4] are fine, whichever is easiest for you.

If you need anything else from us first, please don't hesitate to contact the chairs directly.


Thank you,

Dan Burnett and Matt Stone, Co-chairs, Verifiable Claims Working Group

CC: Specification editors


[1] GitHub repo:  https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model

[2] Mailing list:  public-vc-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>
[3] Most recent dated (fixed) draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/WD/2018-07-18/

[4] Tip of tree editor's draft:  https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/


Received on Monday, 23 July 2018 12:04:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 July 2018 12:04:30 UTC