Re: Question about body and motivatedBy

I am wondering if oa:linking is another option.

If I select a reference I can either say:
- this text is described by this set of triples representing the citation
(oa:describing)
- this text represents a link of this document to an external document
(oa:linking?). This document cites another document through the citation
text that works as a proxy

The second is expressing more explicitly the linking nature of the
annotation.
Thoughts?



On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi Susanna, all,
>
> I don't think that tagging is appropriate for that particular use case, as
> it would imply that the body tags the target.  Personally, I would say that
> it describes the target, using a machine readable language rather than a
> human language.
>
> For example, an equivalent annotation with the body "This paper cites
> another paper" and the annotation with the body "<paper1> cito:cites
> <paper2> ." have the same actual intent, just different intended audiences.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Susanna Netseven <martinelli@netseven.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>> we are discussing about the correct interpretation about motivatedBy
>> predicate.
>>
>> Our Web Annotation model tries to fit both implementation and model
>> correctness needs.
>> At the moment we use body as a graph, cause we provide a client that
>> permits a sort of semantic tagging about the target (that we used to
>> identify as *oa:SpecificResource*)
>> Our body graph contains triple as:
>>
>> <target1> <predicate> <object>
>>
>> where <predicate> could be any of those predicates:* cito:cites*,
>> *cito:describes*, *cito:repliesTo,* *rdfs:comment*,
>> *cito:includesQuotationFrom *and predicates used for
>> other purposes for example temporal tagging, spatial tagging, identifying
>> target as LOD resource (<target> <identifyAs> <dbpedia:Paris>),
>> identifying target as a Class (<target> <dcterms:type> <foaf:Person>).
>>
>> We are discussing about a particular motivation that could cover all of
>> these (and other)
>> cases, and from our point of view the correct one could be *oa:tagging*.
>> Because actually we are doing semantic tag about a resource.
>> Is that correct?
>>
>> Susanna
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305
>



-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703