Re: Question about body and motivatedBy

Or even better a specialization of the oa:linking, which is by definition
'untyped'?
I believe references/citations are a very good widespread example we should
provide guidance on.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am wondering if oa:linking is another option.
>
> If I select a reference I can either say:
> - this text is described by this set of triples representing the citation
> (oa:describing)
> - this text represents a link of this document to an external document
> (oa:linking?). This document cites another document through the citation
> text that works as a proxy
>
> The second is expressing more explicitly the linking nature of the
> annotation.
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Susanna, all,
>>
>> I don't think that tagging is appropriate for that particular use case,
>> as it would imply that the body tags the target.  Personally, I would say
>> that it describes the target, using a machine readable language rather than
>> a human language.
>>
>> For example, an equivalent annotation with the body "This paper cites
>> another paper" and the annotation with the body "<paper1> cito:cites
>> <paper2> ." have the same actual intent, just different intended audiences.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Susanna Netseven <martinelli@netseven.it
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi again,
>>> we are discussing about the correct interpretation about motivatedBy
>>> predicate.
>>>
>>> Our Web Annotation model tries to fit both implementation and model
>>> correctness needs.
>>> At the moment we use body as a graph, cause we provide a client that
>>> permits a sort of semantic tagging about the target (that we used to
>>> identify as *oa:SpecificResource*)
>>> Our body graph contains triple as:
>>>
>>> <target1> <predicate> <object>
>>>
>>> where <predicate> could be any of those predicates:* cito:cites*,
>>> *cito:describes*, *cito:repliesTo,* *rdfs:comment*,
>>> *cito:includesQuotationFrom *and predicates used for
>>> other purposes for example temporal tagging, spatial tagging,
>>> identifying target as LOD resource (<target> <identifyAs> <dbpedia:Paris>),
>>> identifying target as a Class (<target> <dcterms:type> <foaf:Person>).
>>>
>>> We are discussing about a particular motivation that could cover all of
>>> these (and other)
>>> cases, and from our point of view the correct one could be *oa:tagging*.
>>> Because actually we are doing semantic tag about a resource.
>>> Is that correct?
>>>
>>> Susanna
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rob Sanderson
>> Information Standards Advocate
>> Digital Library Systems and Services
>> Stanford, CA 94305
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703
>



-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-2703