- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:30:19 -0400
- To: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <afb0ce1d-a4e0-0d79-3861-5ca06d3d405c@verizon.net>
The goals and objectives emerging from the digital clinical trials workshop are now available in StratML Part 1, Strategic Plan, format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#CTV4F From my perspective, the workshop agenda is a good example of one that could have benefited from publication as a performance plan in StratML Part 2 format so that value-added intermediaries could have facilitated collaboration in support of the workshop objectives before, during, and after the event. StratML-enabled services could also provide valuable support for Objective 2.7: Digital Engagement <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/CTV4FwStyle.xml#_0bbb5164-c870-11e9-b959-06cc2b4cee38> - Sustain digital engagement by providing research participants high treatment value: goal-related interactivity, feedback, support, accountability. Owen On 8/24/2019 1:36 PM, carl mattocks wrote: > Owen, Paola et al: > > Yes, for planning purposes, it is the draft of a proposed AIKR > eGovernance objective.. that leverages emerging data science best > practice and AIKR-centric proofs established by digital clinical trials > > AIKR eGovernance objective > > Wellness Indicator, a simple fit for purpose score, is used to > understand effectiveness of a AIKR powered Business Service capability > . Purpose has been explained by members of particular Community of > Interest (composed of a Richly Diverse group of discipline specific > Data Scientists e.g. Sociologist, psychologist, dermatologist, …). > Explanation is supported by Data Science evidence that the capability > has been proven in Digital Clinical Trials. > > Ref: > https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/events/2019/digital-clinical-trials-workshop-creating-vision-future > > Mandatorily, the COI explanation, of AIKR powered service capability, > identifies how the COI Formulation was Proven when the service was > actuated using one or more Registered Agents. Proof includes DataSet > statistics that report extent of the actual change in state > (unfreezing, changing and refreezing) for the population of > information facets made accessible by a Container populated by > Blockchain & Registry-Repository Objects IDs > > > > > cheers > Carl Mattocks > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net > <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: > > Carl, I can almost discern the makings of a plan in the content of > your slides but it would be easier to comprehend if it were in the > form of an actual plan. > > The stratml:Relationship elements could be used to align it with > the goals set forth in the AIKRCG's plan -- > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AIKRCGwStyle.xml -- using the XForm > at http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml > > If there is any interest in doing so, I'll be happy to provide any > assistance that may be required. > > Owen > > On 8/24/2019 5:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >> Thank you Carl and all >> >> i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted. >> care to unpack it a bit more:? re the slides something >> telegraphic *but hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the >> paper, I may need to articulate some sentence in narrative form >> >> is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or >> that you want to do? >> a couple more questions below >> >> >> Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR .. >> >> Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator >> >> OF WHAT? >> >> derived from Explain effective change in state(unfreezing, >> changing and refreezing) >> >> WHAT CHANGE? >> >> actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & ProvenAIKR) >> >> UHM COI, COI. COI - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for >> what purpose >> >> employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository >> Objects IDs) >> >> UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK? >> >> >> enjoy >> >> Carl Mattocks >> >> Wellness Intelligence . Institute >> >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio >> <paoladimaio10@gmail.com <mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Thank you Carl Owen and Milton' >> I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a >> bit - including a link/url to any fuller resources >> you want to be included. >> Carl could you please explain with one sentence the >> points you make, especially the less obvious one? >> I need to understand what your are saying in order to be >> able to relay it in the talk >> P >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks >> <carlmattocks@gmail.com <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> >> >> My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :} >> >> enjoy >> Carl Mattocks >> >> >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks >> <carlmattocks@gmail.com >> <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> Excellent Title for one or more slides >> AI can do better ... if only we have the >> understanding >> >> Carl Mattocks >> It was a pleasure to clarify >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur >> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net >> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: >> >> Paola, I added a slide entitled >> "'Machine-Readable Knowledge for Results" and >> made a few other tweaks in the attached update. >> >> Having spent my entire 34-year career in >> government, I too dislike politics. I'm >> aiming to disintermediate politics and >> politicians from as much as possible -- in a >> peer-to-peer based worldwide web of >> intentions, stakeholders, and results (which >> is the vision of the StratML standard). >> >> It is not politicians who are to blame so >> much as We the People ourselves. We can do >> better ... if only we have the understanding >> and will to do so. >> >> Is that not the purpose of "representing" >> knowledge? >> >> Owen >> >> On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>> Thank you Owen >>> >>> You send so much stuff and seems all good >>> I completely dislike politics, makes me >>> dizzy even >>> >>> I can easily add two links to the slides and >>> video to my slides and paper as pointers to >>> this work >>> >>> Please take a few more days to elaborate >>> with your associates0 we have one week or so - >>> >>> please give url for both the resources you >>> attached and if you could edit to explain >>> (assuming the audience may not know) with a >>> simple sentence for each point >>> >>> - what is machine readability >>> - how is stratml good to deliver machine >>> readabiity and other benefits vs other options >>> (with link to stratml.org <http://stratml.org>) >>> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and >>> explainability >>> >>> This will make the contribution more >>> relevant to the talk >>> thank you >>> >>> P >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur >>> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net >>> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Paola, there's nifty introduction to >>> StratML presentation at >>> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2 >>> However, it is a bit outdated, is not >>> particularly tailored for a KR audience, >>> and probably includes TMI as well. So I >>> whipped up the attached four slides. >>> Please let me know if you'd like >>> anything more or different. >>> >>> This site reads a previous version of >>> Wikipedia's article on StratML for the >>> benefit of the blind, including >>> information subsequently deleted by the >>> Wikipedia police: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be >>> >>> >>> I'm not much for making (or watching) >>> videos myself but I know that many >>> others are. So I'm copying a couple of >>> my associates in the event they may wish >>> to take up that cause. >>> >>> It's not just politicians who don't want >>> to be held accountable. That's human >>> nature. So beyond the obligation of >>> each of us to hold ourselves and our >>> immediate associates accountable, we >>> also have the power to hold public >>> officials accountable -- regardless of >>> whether they are willing "man up" to >>> doing so themselves or not. However, >>> accountability means more than merely >>> holding opinions and criticizing, based >>> upon our own biases and dueling >>> narratives. It requires clearly >>> specified performance metrics, readily >>> available to stakeholders. >>> >>> In short it requires an open, standard, >>> machine-readable format like StratML. >>> >>> President Trump's management agenda is >>> available in StratML format at >>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, >>> along with a link that opens it in an >>> XForm for anyone who may wish to reports >>> his administration's performance against >>> those objectives. >>> >>> Former President Obama's change.gov >>> <http://change.gov> agenda is available >>> at >>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama >>> >>> A bunch of candidate issue statements >>> are available in StratML format at >>> http://ambur.net/#Candidates >>> >>> The question is whether voters truly >>> want change or whether, like politicians >>> themselves, they are satisfied with more >>> of the same, self-serving #GOFPAU >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D> >>> and only care about gaining the upper >>> hand to impose their will upon others... >>> in which case we will be demonstrating a >>> sadly lacking sense of enlightenment ... >>> an inability to learn from the mistakes >>> of the past, thus dooming future >>> generations to re-living it. >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/ >>> | >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/ >>> >>> If that's the case, shame on us. >>> >>> Owen >>> >>> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>>> Thank you Owen >>>> Most politicians do not really want to >>>> be held accountable for what they say >>>> or do, especially when >>>> their missions fail for unknown reasons >>>> (manouvers in political underworld to >>>> ensure discord) really >>>> that is the problem that xml wont fix. >>>> >>>> People who understand machine >>>> readability, do not need to be convinced >>>> of anything, those who dont >>>> understanding may need a quick lecture, >>>> >>>> I ll make sure your contribution is >>>> included with your compliments :-) if >>>> you want to create >>>> a short video or set of slides >>>> introducing stratML in a few bullet >>>> points also its relation to KR >>>> I can also include it as a link as a >>>> footnote in the slides and paper >>>> Delivers value and does not cost anything >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> PDM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen >>>> Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net >>>> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might >>>> fit into your outline, but from my >>>> perspective, any discussion of >>>> "explainability in e-governance" >>>> would be >>>> incomplete without addressing the >>>> importance of machine-readable public >>>> records based upon internationally >>>> standardized schemas. >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document >>>> | >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/ >>>> >>>> E-gov plans and performance reports >>>> are particularly important sets of >>>> such documents. >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/ >>>> >>>> BTW, it would also be good if the >>>> agendas for events like this were >>>> published as performance plans in >>>> an open, standard, machine-readable >>>> format like StratML Part 2 >>>> (formerly ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that >>>> value-added intermediaries could >>>> facilitate stakeholder collaboration >>>> before, during, and after each >>>> event. See, for example, >>>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml >>>> >>>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about >>>> statements are now in the StratML >>>> collection at >>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT >>>> & >>>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG >>>> >>>> Owen >>>> >>>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio >>>> wrote: >>>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper >>>> next month on the topic >>>> > >>>> > AI KR for Explainability in >>>> EGovernance >>>> > >>>> https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6 >>>> > >>>> > The outline of the talk so far >>>> is: (2-4 slides for each point) >>>> > overview and intro about AI KR >>>> and explainability (assuming audience >>>> > doesn know) >>>> > relevance to E-Governance >>>> > challenges and solutions >>>> > actions (probably referring >>>> people back to this group) >>>> > >>>> > If anyone is interested in >>>> contributing a few slides and a >>>> paragraph >>>> > or two >>>> > let me know and I ll share the >>>> drafts for editing, so that you can >>>> > fill out a few bits >>>> > and of course be credited accordingly >>>> > >>>> > deadline for final submission is >>>> 1 Sept , so all contributions must >>>> > reach me before Aug 30 >>>> > so that I can edit them into the >>>> draft >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, best regards >>>>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 02:30:50 UTC