- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:36:47 -0400
- To: public-aikr@w3.org
- Message-ID: <033d310f-7c4a-7230-12b8-a69229caa218@verizon.net>
Carl, I can almost discern the makings of a plan in the content of your slides but it would be easier to comprehend if it were in the form of an actual plan. The stratml:Relationship elements could be used to align it with the goals set forth in the AIKRCG's plan -- http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AIKRCGwStyle.xml -- using the XForm at http://stratml.us/forms/Part2Form.xml If there is any interest in doing so, I'll be happy to provide any assistance that may be required. Owen On 8/24/2019 5:38 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > Thank you Carl and all > > i appreciate your input, although it still sounds a bit encrypted. > care to unpack it a bit more:? re the slides something telegraphic > *but hopefully clearn nonetheless, will work, for the paper, I may > need to articulate some sentence in narrative form > > is this a suggestion> a proposal> something that you are dong or that > you want to do? > a couple more questions below > > > Embedded this in updated AI can do Better with KR .. > > Wellness (fit for purpose score) Indicator > > OF WHAT? > > derived from Explain effective change in state(unfreezing, > changing and refreezing) > > WHAT CHANGE? > > actuated by Registered Agent (using COI Formulated & ProvenAIKR) > > UHM COI, COI. COI - certificae of insurance? issued by who? for what > purpose > > employing Container Content (Blockchain & Registry-Repository > Objects IDs) > > UHM, HOW DOES THAT WORK? > > > enjoy > > Carl Mattocks > > Wellness Intelligence . Institute > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:56 PM Paola Di Maio > <paoladimaio10@gmail.com <mailto:paoladimaio10@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Thank you Carl Owen and Milton' > I ll use one slide from each of you - which I may edit a bit - > including a link/url to any fuller resources > you want to be included. > Carl could you please explain with one sentence the points you > make, especially the less obvious one? > I need to understand what your are saying in order to be able > to relay it in the talk > P > > > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:44 AM carl mattocks > <carlmattocks@gmail.com <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > My contribution .. using my own suggestion for Title :} > > enjoy > Carl Mattocks > > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM carl mattocks > <carlmattocks@gmail.com <mailto:carlmattocks@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Excellent Title for one or more slides > AI can do better ... if only we have the understanding > > Carl Mattocks > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 1:35 PM Owen Ambur > <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net > <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: > > Paola, I added a slide entitled "'Machine-Readable > Knowledge for Results" and made a few other tweaks > in the attached update. > > Having spent my entire 34-year career in > government, I too dislike politics. I'm aiming to > disintermediate politics and politicians from as > much as possible -- in a peer-to-peer based > worldwide web of intentions, stakeholders, and > results (which is the vision of the StratML > standard). > > It is not politicians who are to blame so much as > We the People ourselves. We can do better ... if > only we have the understanding and will to do so. > > Is that not the purpose of "representing" knowledge? > > Owen > > On 8/21/2019 11:01 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >> Thank you Owen >> >> You send so much stuff and seems all good >> I completely dislike politics, makes me dizzy even >> >> I can easily add two links to the slides and >> video to my slides and paper as pointers to this work >> >> Please take a few more days to elaborate with >> your associates0 we have one week or so - >> >> please give url for both the resources you >> attached and if you could edit to explain >> (assuming the audience may not know) with a >> simple sentence for each point >> >> - what is machine readability >> - how is stratml good to deliver machine >> readabiity and other benefits vs other options >> (with link to stratml.org <http://stratml.org>) >> - how is machine redabiity relates to KR and >> explainability >> >> This will make the contribution more relevant to >> the talk >> thank you >> >> P >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:47 AM Owen Ambur >> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net >> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: >> >> Paola, there's nifty introduction to StratML >> presentation at >> https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/32364433/introduction-to-stratml-aiim/2 >> However, it is a bit outdated, is not >> particularly tailored for a KR audience, and >> probably includes TMI as well. So I whipped >> up the attached four slides. Please let me >> know if you'd like anything more or different. >> >> This site reads a previous version of >> Wikipedia's article on StratML for the >> benefit of the blind, including information >> subsequently deleted by the Wikipedia police: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV_6rsBOG4o&feature=youtu.be >> >> >> I'm not much for making (or watching) videos >> myself but I know that many others are. So >> I'm copying a couple of my associates in the >> event they may wish to take up that cause. >> >> It's not just politicians who don't want to >> be held accountable. That's human nature. >> So beyond the obligation of each of us to >> hold ourselves and our immediate associates >> accountable, we also have the power to hold >> public officials accountable -- regardless of >> whether they are willing "man up" to doing so >> themselves or not. However, accountability >> means more than merely holding opinions and >> criticizing, based upon our own biases and >> dueling narratives. It requires clearly >> specified performance metrics, readily >> available to stakeholders. >> >> In short it requires an open, standard, >> machine-readable format like StratML. >> >> President Trump's management agenda is >> available in StratML format at >> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Trump, >> along with a link that opens it in an XForm >> for anyone who may wish to reports his >> administration's performance against those >> objectives. >> >> Former President Obama's change.gov >> <http://change.gov> agenda is available at >> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#Obama >> >> A bunch of candidate issue statements are >> available in StratML format at >> http://ambur.net/#Candidates >> >> The question is whether voters truly want >> change or whether, like politicians >> themselves, they are satisfied with more of >> the same, self-serving #GOFPAU >> <https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/all/?authorCompany=%5B%5D&authorIndustry=%5B%5D&contactInterest=%5B%5D&facetCity=%5B%5D&facetCompany=%5B%5D&facetConnectionOf=%5B%5D&facetCurrentCompany=%5B%5D&facetCurrentFunction=%5B%5D&facetGeoRegion=%5B%5D&facetGroup=%5B%5D&facetGuides=%5B%5D&facetIndustry=%5B%5D&facetNetwork=%5B%5D&facetNonprofitInterest=%5B%5D&facetPastCompany=%5B%5D&facetProfessionalEvent=%5B%5D&facetProfileLanguage=%5B%5D&facetRegion=%5B%5D&facetSchool=%5B%5D&facetSeniority=%5B%5D&facetServiceCategory=%5B%5D&facetState=%5B%5D&groups=%5B%5D&keywords=%23gofpau&origin=GLOBAL_SEARCH_HEADER&page=1&refresh=false&skillExplicit=%5B%5D&topic=%5B%5D> >> and only care about gaining the upper hand to >> impose their will upon others... in which >> case we will be demonstrating a sadly lacking >> sense of enlightenment ... an inability to >> learn from the mistakes of the past, thus >> dooming future generations to re-living it. >> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/enlightenment-what-we-fighting-owen-ambur/ >> | >> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fighting-political-polarization-owen-ambur/ >> >> If that's the case, shame on us. >> >> Owen >> >> On 8/21/2019 12:35 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>> Thank you Owen >>> Most politicians do not really want to be >>> held accountable for what they say or do, >>> especially when >>> their missions fail for unknown reasons >>> (manouvers in political underworld to ensure >>> discord) really >>> that is the problem that xml wont fix. >>> >>> People who understand machine readability, >>> do not need to be convinced >>> of anything, those who dont understanding >>> may need a quick lecture, >>> >>> I ll make sure your contribution is included >>> with your compliments :-) if you want to create >>> a short video or set of slides introducing >>> stratML in a few bullet points also its >>> relation to KR >>> I can also include it as a link as a >>> footnote in the slides and paper >>> Delivers value and does not cost anything >>> >>> Thanks >>> PDM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:17 AM Owen Ambur >>> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net >>> <mailto:Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Paola, I'm not sure how it might fit >>> into your outline, but from my >>> perspective, any discussion of >>> "explainability in e-governance" would be >>> incomplete without addressing the >>> importance of machine-readable public >>> records based upon internationally >>> standardized schemas. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document >>> | >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/ >>> >>> E-gov plans and performance reports are >>> particularly important sets of >>> such documents. >>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-machine-readable-government-owen-ambur/ >>> >>> BTW, it would also be good if the >>> agendas for events like this were >>> published as performance plans in an >>> open, standard, machine-readable >>> format like StratML Part 2 (formerly >>> ANSI/AIIM 22:2017) so that >>> value-added intermediaries could >>> facilitate stakeholder collaboration >>> before, during, and after each event. >>> See, for example, >>> http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/part2/BS2019wStyle.xml >>> >>> In any event, IACT and TEG's about >>> statements are now in the StratML >>> collection at >>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IACT >>> & >>> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#TEG >>> >>> Owen >>> >>> On 8/21/2019 1:14 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote: >>> > We are giving a talk *and a paper next >>> month on the topic >>> > >>> > AI KR for Explainability in EGovernance >>> > >>> https://iac2019.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=81CD552EA1F70BF6 >>> > >>> > The outline of the talk so far is: >>> (2-4 slides for each point) >>> > overview and intro about AI KR and >>> explainability (assuming audience >>> > doesn know) >>> > relevance to E-Governance >>> > challenges and solutions >>> > actions (probably referring people >>> back to this group) >>> > >>> > If anyone is interested in >>> contributing a few slides and a paragraph >>> > or two >>> > let me know and I ll share the drafts >>> for editing, so that you can >>> > fill out a few bits >>> > and of course be credited accordingly >>> > >>> > deadline for final submission is 1 >>> Sept , so all contributions must >>> > reach me before Aug 30 >>> > so that I can edit them into the draft >>> > >>> > Thanks, best regards >>>
Received on Saturday, 24 August 2019 14:37:17 UTC