[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISO application for SDO membership of the PSO - DRAFT of part of theresponse



Hello Azucena,

Your wording looks very good. Thanks.

Regards,    Martin.

At 09:58 02/04/11 +0200, azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es wrote:
>Dear Geoff, dear PSO PC colleagues,
>
>Thanks a lot for your draft whose words look to me somehow stronger and far
>beyond our discussion yesterday. I would prefer a softer response to ISO
>not precluding that the PSO is going to disappear in the process of the
>reorganization of ICANN.
>
>I would suggest something like this:
>
>"The PSO PC welcomes your application for membership within the PSO and
>would like to address the following points to you:
>
>1.- We miss some important information in your application regarding the
>fulfillment of criteria 8 (a) (ii) of the PSO MoU. We kindly ask you to
>submit details about that.
>
>2.- Considering the ongoing discussions taking place within ICANN about its
>own structure and the ones of the present Supporting Organizations, the PSO
>PC is in favour of postponing any decision about new membership into the
>PSO until further clarification emerges from the ongoing discussions. "
>
>I am willing to discuss any other wording but I would have problems to
>accept the initial draft from Geoff.
>
>Kind regards,
>Azucena
>
>
>
>
>Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>@pso.icann.org con fecha 10/04/2002 15:26:00
>
>Por favor, responda a Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
>
>Enviado por:   owner-pso-pc@pso.icann.org
>
>
>Destinatarios: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int>
>CC:       "pso-pc, ITU (MLIST)" <pso-pc@ties.itu.ch>
>Asunto:   Re: ISO application for SDO membership of the PSO - DRAFT of
>           part of the response
>
>
>Draft of response regarding application from ISO:
>
>---
>We note that within the current process for ICANN evolution and reform the
>role of the Protocol Support Organization (PSO) and the associated Protocol
>Support Council is under review. One potential outcome of this review, as
>noted in discussion papers prepared by the ICANN President and CEO, is that
>the PSO ceases to exist in its current form.
>
>It would be premature to admit new members to this organization at this
>point in time given this level of uncertainty over the future of the PSO.
>Once ICANN itself has a more stable view of its intended role and
>associated operating model, and if the Protocol Support Organization exists
>in a format similar to today within this model, the IETF members of the PSO
>would then be happy to consider this application on its merits, according
>to the criteria outlined in the PSO MoU.
>
>
>---
>
>(It is also requested that the applicant address the criteris of 8(a)(ii)
>of the PSO MoU)
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>informaci$B…O(B privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario
>indicado, queda notificado de que la utilizaci$B…O(B, divulgaci$B…O(B y/o copia sin
>autorizaci$B…O(B est$Ba(Bprohibida en virtud de la legislaci$B…O(B vigente. Si ha
>recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique
>inmediatamente por esta misma v$ByB(B y proceda a su destrucci$B…O(B.
>
>
>This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain
>information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional privilege.
>If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
>dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
>prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please
>immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
>___________________________________________________________________________