Dear colleagues of the PSO-PC I have some comments to the minutes. 1. Point 3. I would add after the first sentence. It was agreed to take the issue of a separate ccTLD Support Organisation to the agenda of the next audioconference meeting in order to deal with the whole matter of increasing the number of support organisations and how this development affects the ICANN organisation. It was also agreed to bring the issue of shared registry... This was the order in which these matters were discussed in the meeting. 2. The agreed texts For the sake of clarity let us have the referred texts repeated as annexes in the minutes i.e: -in point 2 the ETSI and IETF comments -in point 4 the ETSI, IETF and possibly W3C comments if available Concerning the ITU-T SG 2 statement I would be happy to continue the discussion in this e-mail forum on where is the link between "national sovereignity" and the alternetive root issue in order to understand what is really meant with this statement. Having participated in the recent ITU Plenipots and WTSAs I have some experience of the nature of the political statements of this sort and therefore I would like to be very clear of their content. 3. Next PSO-PC teleconfernce meetiing is naturally 26th October; not September which is gone already with best recards Tapio ----- Original Message ----- From: "Androuchko, Vladimir" <vladimir.androuchko@itu.int> To: "pso-pc, ITU (MLIST)" <pso-pc@ties.itu.int> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 4:04 PM Subject: Minutes of the 28 September Teleconference > Hello, > Dear Protocol Council Members, > Please find attached for your consideration the Minutes of last conference > call. > Best regards, > Vlad > <<Minutes28Sept.doc>> >