Vlad, thank your for preparing these minutes. Two comments: - My understanding was that the deadline for reaching consensus on the At-Large study report comments was October 20, and not October 15 as stated in the minutes - The section on the alternate route statement does not contain the alternative wording supported by W3C, IETF and ETSI, although a proposal that has rough consensus already exists (see Steve's mail). I would suggest that we either do not put any concrete wording in the minutes, or hold back sending out the minutes until Steve has updated the alternate wording. -Philipp "Androuchko, Vladimir" a écrit : > > Hello, > Dear Protocol Council Members, > Please find attached for your consideration the Minutes of last conference > call. > Best regards, > Vlad > <<Minutes28Sept.doc>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: Minutes28Sept.doc > Minutes28Sept.doc Type: WINWORD Fichier (application/msword) > Encoding: base64