W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:40:22 +0200
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20161019164022.GB1054@1wt.eu>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:29:56AM -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 08:45 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > It could be useful to know if Squid sees such responses, because in general
> > it will not be used to access local network devices but will still face the
> > internet and a wide spectrum of self-hosted servers that we don't see.
> The Squid Project does not collect customer statistics but there is
> plenty of evidence that Squid HTTP/0 code is still in use. Naturally,
> most of that evidence comes as bugs related to misinterpreting malformed
> HTTP/1 traffic as HTTP/0

That's exactly the way I would expect them to report it.

> but, IIRC, intercepting customers still see
> genuine HTTP/0 _requests_ from various scripts and devices. Some of
> those requests may expect an HTTP/0 response...

Indeed, very good point.

Thanks Alex,
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 16:40:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 October 2016 16:40:59 UTC