W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:28:13 +0000
To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <48464.1476739693@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAEK7mvq=Z8-E4hm3S-aPpUnsYjAauA-9BbgFkq=onC3riE_XUg@mail.gmail.com>
, Matt Menke writes:

>If we had buy-in from other browser vendors to all drop
>support at once, I think it would be easier to finally remove it, though
>that would potentially leave a lot of end users with unconfigurable

How about really annoying pop-ups for a starter ?

After all, that has been very successful at keeping self-signed
certificates from making NSAs job harder ? :-)

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 21:28:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 17 October 2016 21:28:41 UTC