W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: RFC6265bis status

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:22:18 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jim Manico <jim@manicode.com>
cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610050817330.28134@tvnag.unkk.fr>
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Jim Manico wrote:

> If I may, why not allow multiple cookies per domain with the •same name• but 
> different values? This is already the case with request parameters in order 
> to support multi-select lists, why not cookies for similar use cases?

Note that these cookies I showed were set by the exact same domain and path, 
only with different domain properties (and only the leading dot changed) - so 
clearly Chrome and Firefox agree on how to deal with them while Edge and 
Safari have their own ideas. I don't see how them having different values 
would make anything different.

Multiple cookies could always be set for different paths on the same domain 
without problems.


  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 06:22:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 October 2016 06:22:47 UTC