Re: RFC6265bis status

On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> It seems like we're at a point where we can start incorporating the draft 
> proposals into a complete document, so that we can see how it works as a 
> whole, identify any remaining issues, and discuss them

We ran into an interesting cookie issue the other day in curl. Namely how to 
deal with two otherwise identically named cookies where the domain property 
differs only in a leading dot or not:

   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2016-09/0103.html

The two points being:
  1 - Are they two cookies or one?
  2 - In which order should they be sent by the client if two.

A revised spec should probably detail this too so that browsers (and others) 
will align.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 05:59:29 UTC