W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: New Version Notification for draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-01.txt

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:34:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdoo1zh6b_P6UcStxHaomp4fu3H_Mto7wvkmMNKfyZ01w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Just look up the arguments for/against end_segment.



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
wrote:

> On 23/07/2014 5:56 p.m., Roberto Peon wrote:
> > Actually, it is an issue, so long as there is no ordering requirement on
> > extension frames (as we'd have had with END_SEGMENT).
> >
> > We've not imposed (actually removed) such restrictions on proxies, and so
> > we may find that there is no way to do it in the future. That would be a
> > sad day.
> > -=R
> >
>
> Reference please. I see no mention of proxies being allowed to re-order
> any frame type (even control frames) *within* a stream in h2-13.
>
> Amos
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2014 07:35:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC