W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: PRIORITY extension

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:32:20 +0000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37013.1405287140@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CABkgnnUcP9QToaDru75nYqgy2E=+m8nSoevhSYfKQmKODNR0OQ@mail.gmail.com>, Martin Thomson w
>On 12 July 2014 13:46,  <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote:
>> So, why not move PRIORITY to an extension? It would make the main spec smaller and cleaner.
>A multiplexed protocol doesn't work without prioritization.  Or
>rather, it ends up worse than what we currently have.

But we agree that it is optional, right ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 21:32:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC