W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Call for Consensus: Frame size (to address #553)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:40:16 +0000
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <37132.1405287616@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CA+pLO_h2799vs37eY1HaSnBUmcGkGW-tmjTCJe1WeKZJRAtQGA@mail.gmail.com>, Jeff Pinner writ

>So am I to read this as a client might advertise a max frame size of
>256 bytes and then request a 2GB file?


And the server is free to return 418 or react in any other way it might
find appropriate.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Sunday, 13 July 2014 21:40:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:57:09 UTC