- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:12:22 -0700
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 18 June 2014 13:06, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > Date is a hop-by-hop header, if it serves no use on a HTTP/2.0 to > HTTP/2.0 hop, we can eliminate it, just like we eliminated the > double CRNL after the headers, because it serves no use. It's not hop-by-hop by my reading: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.2 I'm not disagreeing with your premise, just the choice of the wagon you are hitching this too.
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:12:49 UTC