W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:00:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV6bx749PZ2jYQauf1MA8p9keVTFQk77yyXDk=Zam3Edg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

On 27 February 2013 13:55, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Why can't we stick to UTF-8 for text?

A good question.  Conversion to and from ISO-8859-1 is probably easier
than supporting both in protocol.  Saves a bit too.

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 22:01:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Martin Thomson: "Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name"
Previous message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Giving the Framing Layer a real name"
In reply to: Julian Reschke: "Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update"
Next in thread: James M Snell: "Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update"
Reply: James M Snell: "Re: HTTP/2 Header Encoding Status Update"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 February 2013 22:01:14 GMT