W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Outstanding Action Items

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:44:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYijAhSd+8apEakjTAfwXm87nT_oyoPn4cpCcmAMkeswRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
<snip>

> * Will: double check that spdy's change to directionality for max streams has made it into http/2, or raise issue.

"""

4 - SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS allows the sender to inform
         the remote endpoint the maximum number of concurrent streams
         which it will allow.  By default there is no limit.  For
         implementors it is recommended that this value be no smaller
         than 100.
"""

It's the same text as we've had in SPDY/2, and our SPDY/4 draft is the
same. This wording is technically correct, but it does not
particularly emphasize that the limit is directional. I can imagine
first time readers misinterpreting it.
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 03:45:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 February 2013 03:45:32 GMT